[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]
    Stuart Young wrote:
    > At 11:05 PM 4/11/01 -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
    > >On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Stuart Young wrote:
    > >
    > > > Any reason we can't move all the process info into something like
    > > > /proc/pid/* instead of in the root /proc tree?
    > >
    > >Thanks, but no thanks. If we are starting to move stuff around, we
    > >would be much better off leaving in /proc only what it was supposed
    > >to contain - per-process information.

    We could add a file into /proc like /proc/processes that contains once
    all process informations that some programs like top or ps can read only
    It could save a lot of time in kernel mode scanning the process list for
    each process.
    later, a new version of ps or top could simply stat /proc/processes and
    if it exists uses it to give informations to the user.
    What do you think of this idea ?

    ICQ 36157579
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.023 / U:388.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site