lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 3 Nov 2001 14:36:02 +0100 (CET)
FromDave Jones <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 Telford002@aol.com wrote:

> >  solution: keep the type information out of the proc filesystem and save it
> >  in a file similar to Configure.help, together with a description for a
> file.
> It would always be possible to build a front end to the /proc file
> system.

The approach taken by powertweak (http://www..powertweak.org) was to
use an XML description of /proc to define types etc. It's worked out
quite well, and has the added advantage of being buzzword compliant 8)

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:12    [W:0.420 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans