![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> how much do you think you can get out of a server with several 1Gb >> ethernet cards, multiple 66MHz/64bit PCI busses, multiple SCSI busses or >> perhaps some sort of SAN solution based on FibreChannel 2? > > Ok, > on this hardware i think that the problem is the that the Kernel and > Webserver need to suport that ( each of the 1Gbit card is bound to its > own process and on Multiprozessor machine that the prozess is fixed to > one CPU to minimize the siwtch overhead, also im not firm with the > FibreChannel2 > spezifikation i think that there can some trouble with the load, but much > more important is to know how much different data is served, because then > you talk about khttpd i think that it is definit static data and so the > question > is how much, because on an ideal case the whole set of files is cached > in the > ram, with 500 hundred Users i think there is only minmal patch in the > kernel to > do for higher file handles. So if there is only there the choice left open > tux or khttpd i think you should use tux What's this patch thing? Do I need to patch up or rewrite parts of the kernel to support <1000 file handles? --- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12 [W:0.094 / U:0.090 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||