lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromJohn Alvord <>
SubjectRe: About 2.4.16
DateThu, 29 Nov 2001 16:40:25 -0800
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:51:52 -0800, Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:04:49PM +0100, pil@mailnet.de wrote:
>> Martin Eriksson wrote:
>> > 
>> 
>> > 
>> > Oh.. 2.4.13 was pretty usable too, so maybe 3 times slower?
>> > 
>> 
>> Not for me. I reported an hfs-bug for 2.4.12 up to 2.4.14. So 6 times
>> slower would be the best for the users and - I guess - developers too.
>> 
>
>more/faster -pre and less/slower releases.

The true limiting factor is getting an adaquate test environments run.
Slowing releases down wouldn't increase that much..

john alvord
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.246 / U:0.030 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans