![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:51:52 -0800, Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:04:49PM +0100, pil@mailnet.de wrote: >> Martin Eriksson wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Oh.. 2.4.13 was pretty usable too, so maybe 3 times slower? >> > >> >> Not for me. I reported an hfs-bug for 2.4.12 up to 2.4.14. So 6 times >> slower would be the best for the users and - I guess - developers too. >> > >more/faster -pre and less/slower releases. The true limiting factor is getting an adaquate test environments run. Slowing releases down wouldn't increase that much.. john alvord - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13 [W:0.246 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||