![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Anton Blanchard wrote: > The dbench-o-matic results from removing the BKL from llseek can be > found here: > > http://samba.org/~anton/linux/llseek/ > > Same hardware as the earlier test, 12 way ppc64. The patch is pretty > dumb, I just pushed the kernel lock down into the llseek methods and > only replaced it with the inode semaphore in generic_llseek. Im sure > Al will have a better fix for 2.5, I just wanted to highlight the > problem :) yeah i did that once (about a year ago or more) and it was rejected, cant remember why :-) But it's indeed an important optimization and it shows up in dbench overhead. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:13 [W:0.289 / U:0.090 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||