![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:38:23AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:30:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > final: > > > - Fix 8139too oops (Philipp Matthias Hahn) > > > > Won't that be a good idea to keep the -final the same as the last -pre? > > I don't see why: the 8139 fix has been tested and it _fixes_ and oops: Its > not an enhancement. Seen, believed and agreed (who cares if I don't ...;)) Thanks for all who replied to my postings on this issue on and off the list. Some of my postings may not have meant what I really wanted to mean, but those were my humble openion towards a more stable (huh, to increase the value of infinity ...;)) kernel. Just few cents, though. Cheers, Anruadha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.16) #define FALSE 0 /* This is the naked Truth */ #define TRUE 1 /* and this is the Light */ -- mailto.c - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||