Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:44:35 +0600 | From | Anuradha Ratnaweera <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.16 |
| |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:38:23AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:30:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > final: > > > - Fix 8139too oops (Philipp Matthias Hahn) > > > > Won't that be a good idea to keep the -final the same as the last -pre? > > I don't see why: the 8139 fix has been tested and it _fixes_ and oops: Its > not an enhancement.
Seen, believed and agreed (who cares if I don't ...;))
Thanks for all who replied to my postings on this issue on and off the list.
Some of my postings may not have meant what I really wanted to mean, but those were my humble openion towards a more stable (huh, to increase the value of infinity ...;)) kernel. Just few cents, though.
Cheers,
Anruadha
--
Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.16)
#define FALSE 0 /* This is the naked Truth */ #define TRUE 1 /* and this is the Light */ -- mailto.c
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |