[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16

    On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > Mike Fedyk wrote:
    > >
    > > > I'll send you a patch which makes the VM less inclined to page things
    > > > out in the presence of heavy writes, and which decreases read
    > > > latencies.
    > > >
    > > Is this patch posted anywhere?
    > I sent it yesterday, in this thread. Here it is again.
    > Description:
    > - Account for locked as well as dirty buffers when deciding
    > to throttle writers.

    Just one thing: If we have lots of locked buffers due to reads we are
    going to may unecessarily block writes, and thats not any good.

    But well, I prefer to fix interactivity than to care about that one kind
    of workload, so I'm ok with it.

    > - Tweak VM to make it work the inactive list harder, before starting
    > to evict pages or swap.

    I would like to see he interactivity problems get fixed on block layer
    side first: Its not a VM issue initially. Actually, the thing is that if
    you tweak VM this way you're going to break some workloads.

    > - Change the elevator so that once a request's latency has
    > expired, we can still perform merges in front of that
    > request. But we no longer will insert new requests in
    > front of that request.

    Sounds fine... I've received quite many success reports already, right ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.022 / U:16.880 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site