![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 06:32, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I am not against a proc interface per se, I would like a proc > > interface, especially for the reading of affinity values. But in my > > view the system call interface should also exist and it should be the > > dominate way of communicating affinity to processes. > > i'm not against the /proc interface either - on the contrary, i've picked > it when implementing /proc/irq/<NR>/smp_affinity. What if we kept the procfs interface for read only and keep both syscalls for read and write ? The proc read interface is 2 lines of code in one function ... very much of my patch would be gone. Again, personally, I'd like to see proc for writing and reading, but ... Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:13 [W:0.333 / U:0.000 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||