Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] 2.5/2.6/2.7 transition [was Re: Linux 2.4.16-pre1] | Date | Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:54:13 -0300 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
=?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?= <wtarreau@yahoo.fr> said:
> Well, I know this has been discussed several times, but why not having 2 > stable trees : one for the average "joe" user which would include fixes > and new features, and one for prod servers which will have only bugfixes, > and quite old, tested features, with less risks of regression.
Think distributions, think 2.2.x (still actively maintained), think 2.4.x (just now declared stable, ready for "just bugfixes"), and think 2.5.x + assorted unofficial patches. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |