lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Release Policy [was: Linux 2.4.16 ]
    Date
    >>>>> "MT" == Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> writes:

    MT> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >> Consistency is a Very Good Thing[TM] (says the one who tries to teach
    >> scripts to understand the naming.) The advantage with the -rc naming is
    >> that it avoids the -pre5, -pre6, -pre-final, -pre-final-really,
    >> -pre-final-really-i-mean-it-this-time phenomenon when the release
    >> candidate wasn't quite worthy, you just go -rc1, -rc2, -rc3. There is no
    >> shame in needing more than one release candidate.

    MT> Agreed. I stick with the -rc naming convention for 2.4+...

    (This is a request to maintainers of three stable trees).

    While we are on the topic, could you also coordinate to keep the
    EXTRAVERSION strings consistent? 2.4.X-preN uses "-preN" but
    2.2.X-preN uses "preN" without leading "-".
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.053 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site