![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 24 Nov 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <tgy9kwf02c.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> > By author: Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > > However, if it's really true that DTLA drives and their successor > > > corrupt blocks (generate bad blocks) on power loss during block writes, > > > these drives are crap. > > > > They do, even IBM admits that (on > > > > http://www.cooling-solutions.de/dtla-faq > > > > you find a quote from IBM confirming this). IBM says it's okay, you > > have to expect this to happen. So much for their expertise in making > > hard disks. This makes me feel rather dizzy (lots of IBM drives in > > use). > > > > No sh*t. I have always been favouring IBM drives, and I had a RAID > system with these drives bought. It will be a LONG time before I buy > another IBM drive, that's for sure. I can't believe they don't even > have the decency of saying "we fucked". Peter, Remember my soon to be famous quote. Everything about storage is a LIE, and that is the only true I stand by. Andre Hedrick Linux Disk Certification Project Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:18 [W:0.493 / U:0.280 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||