Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:24:16 +0000 | From | Anton Altaparmakov <> | Subject | Re: Which gcc version? |
| |
Hi Andrew,
At 20:14 23/11/01, Andrew Morton wrote: >Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about. > >except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed >of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes >me a quad Xeon, thanks very much.
Have you read the current Documentation/Changes? It says "the 2.5 tree is likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds". Whoever wrote that seems to be wanting to break it in the near future...
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |