![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>>>> " " == Samuel Maftoul <maftoul@esrf.fr> writes:
> I thought that NFS's underlying FS do not have any effect on
> NFS performances, and that the client is not aware of the
> ("local") remote FS. Am I wrong ? Does anybody have an idea to
> fix the problem ?
Why do you think that something on the client is 'aware' of the remote
fs?
My guess is that you need to redo your test using a TCP mount for the
Linux machine (that's what your Solaris client is doing). My guess is
that you are hitting a UDP transport reliability problem in the
DirectIO case...
> Is it a bug in NFS's implementation of linux kernel ?
No.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||