lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
    Date
    In article <Pine.GSO.4.21.0111020359540.12621-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>,
    Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
    >On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Rusty Russell wrote:
    >
    >> On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 05:42:36 -0500
    >> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> > Is this designed to replace sysctl?
    >>
    >> Well, I'd suggest replacing *all* the non-process stuff in /proc. Yes.
    >
    >Aha. Like, say it, /proc/kcore. Or /proc/mounts, yodda, yodda.

    Well in 2.5 union mounts are going to go in right? Then you could
    have a compatibility "proc-compat" filesystem that reads data from
    /kernel and supplies it in backwards compatible formats such as
    /proc/mounts, that you union-mount over /proc

    And in 2.7, rm -rf linux/fs/proc-compat

    Mike.
    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
    and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.021 / U:0.432 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site