[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
    In article <>,
    Alexander Viro <> wrote:
    >On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Rusty Russell wrote:
    >> On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 05:42:36 -0500
    >> Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
    >> > Is this designed to replace sysctl?
    >> Well, I'd suggest replacing *all* the non-process stuff in /proc. Yes.
    >Aha. Like, say it, /proc/kcore. Or /proc/mounts, yodda, yodda.

    Well in 2.5 union mounts are going to go in right? Then you could
    have a compatibility "proc-compat" filesystem that reads data from
    /kernel and supplies it in backwards compatible formats such as
    /proc/mounts, that you union-mount over /proc

    And in 2.7, rm -rf linux/fs/proc-compat

    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
    and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.067 / U:12.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site