Messages in this thread | | | From | "Petr Vandrovec" <> | Date | Fri, 2 Nov 2001 19:41:20 MET-1 | Subject | Re: Oops on 2.4.13 |
| |
On 2 Nov 01 at 13:02, Keith Owens wrote:
> drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_crtc2.o - no license, needs patch > drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_g450.o - no license, needs patch > drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_maven.o - no license, needs patch > drivers/video/matrox/matroxfb_misc.o - no license, needs patch
They are all GPL-ed. Does it mean that I have to fix that someone else changed kernel API during stable serie? Thanks, Petr Vandrovec vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
P.S.: I still do not understand this MODULE_LICENSE() thing. VMware modules will probably contain GPL tag in next release, but kernel hackers refuse to look at these reports anyway (I'm not complaining, this is their right to ignore these reports; but if they say that they are doing that due to non-GPL, they lie). So I think it should be changed from MODULE_LICENSE() to MODULE_CERTIFIED_BY_LINUX_KERNEL_WORKING_GROUP("xxx says it works"). It would match real meaning much better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |