![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > Frankly, I'd prefer to try (b) before reverting to (a). Patch doing that > variant follows. Linus, your opinion? (d) make seq_file have my originally suggested "subposition" code. Ie make the X low bits of "pos" be the position in the record, with the high bits of "pos" being the current "record index" kind of thing. That makes lseek() happy. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:13 [W:0.481 / U:0.200 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||