![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de said: > BTW: I think the current logic is useful, as it allows the user to > specify in the beginning that he doesn't have an ISA/ISAPNP bus and > thus gets never asked for drivers/features he couldn't possibly use. > But that may be a matter of taste, and I believe CML2 allows for > both. Then the first set of CML2 rules which get merged should not be changing the behaviour of such things - they should be looked at later. The first merge of CML2 should have rules which _exactly_ match the existing behaviour of CML1. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18 [W:0.195 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||