lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] lvm in 2.4.15.pre3
    On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:04:12PM +0000, you [Patrick Caulfield] claimed:
    > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 05:51:01PM +0200, Ville Herva wrote:
    > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 02:34:32PM +0000, you [Patrick Caulfield] claimed:
    > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:23:37PM +0200, Ville Herva wrote:
    > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:19:01PM +0000, you [Alan Cox] claimed:
    > > > > > > Please apply the following patch to LVM in 2.4.13pre3.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > It looks like the LVM patch that came from Alan calls alloc/free_kiovec_sz
    > > > ()
    > > > > > > functions which only exist in his tree.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Just sent Linus the same thing 8)
    > > > >
    > > > > Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I see the LVM in .15pre3 is 0.9.1beta2. Are there
    > > > > plans to merge something newer like 1.0.1pre4?
    > > >
    > > > I think you've misread the patch:
    > > >
    > > > lvm.h:#define LVM_RELEASE_NAME "1.0.1-rc4(ish)"
    > >
    > > Ummh, maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my copy of 2.4.15pre3 says
    > >
    > > less -N include/linux/lvm.h:
    > > 67 #ifndef _LVM_H_INCLUDE
    > > 68 #define _LVM_H_INCLUDE
    > > 69
    > > 70 #define _LVM_KERNEL_H_VERSION "LVM 0.9.1_beta2 (18/01/2001)"
    > > 71
    > > 72 #include <linux/config.h>
    > > 73 #include <linux/version.h>
    > >
    >
    > > ./drivers/md/lvm-internal.h:#define _LVM_INTERNAL_H_VERSION "LVM"LVM_RELEASE_NAME" ("LVM_RELEASE_DATE")"
    > >
    > > Does it generate the LVM_RELEASE_NAME dynamically on first build?
    >
    > No it doesn't.
    >
    > I can only assume your patch hasn't applied correctly - look at the patch
    > itself:
    >
    > @@ -67,9 +73,11 @@
    > #ifndef _LVM_H_INCLUDE
    > #define _LVM_H_INCLUDE
    >
    > -#define _LVM_KERNEL_H_VERSION "LVM 0.9.1_beta2 (18/01/2001)"
    > +#define LVM_RELEASE_NAME "1.0.1-rc4(ish)"
    > +#define LVM_RELEASE_DATE "03/10/2001"
    > +
    > +#define _LVM_KERNEL_H_VERSION "LVM "LVM_RELEASE_NAME" ("LVM_RELEASE_DATE")"
    >
    > -#include <linux/config.h>
    > #include <linux/version.h>

    It must be that (I was using non-gnu patch(1)).

    Sorry for the noise.

    BTW: When was 1.0.1-rc4 merged to -ac / mainline? I missed that...


    -- v --

    v@iki.fi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.025 / U:2.796 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site