![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Followup to: <20011111190114.A31746@redhat.com> By author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:58:30AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > The below seems to make flogging noises, but is likely too soggy. > > Erk, the behaviour of str with your patch isn't quite compatible > enough for a smooth transition. What is really needed is to have > "str" error out or generate the existing strl with a huge warning > about unspecified type. Either way the kernel has to work with > both old and new tools for a brief period of time. > The current behaviour is a bug, plain and simple. The only way to make backwards-compatible behaviour is to make "strl %eax" and "strw %ax" behave properly while "str %ax" really does an "strl %eax" (the current, broken, behaviour.) -hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:13 [W:0.062 / U:0.130 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||