![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111101516050.14500-100000@omega.hbh.net> you wrote: > Hello ! > Anyone has an idea, why this ext3 "fails" at this specific test while on > normal fs-benchmarks it is much better ? ext3 by default imposes stricter ordering than the other journalling filesystems in order to improve _data_ consistency (as opposed to just the guarantee of consistent metadata as most other filesystems do). if you mount the filesystem with mount -t ext3 -o data=writeback /dev/foo /mnt/bar will make it use the same level of guarantee as reiserfs does. mount -t ext3 -o data=journal /dev/foo /mnt/bar will do FULL data journalling and will also guarantee data integrety after a crash... Greetings, Arjan van de Ven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||