![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 01:44:20PM +0100, Padraig Brady wrote: > But the point is you, only ever would want nano second resolution to make > sure you notice all changes to a file. A more general (and much simpler) > solution would be to gen_count++ every time a file's modified. What other > applications would require better than second resolution on files? Correlating file timestamps with an event log. Comparing timestamps on different files (make). Real time is _much_ more useful (not to mention convenient) than a generation count; and given that we've survived with second resolution so far, I think the hypothetical collisions on a nanosecond scale are ignorable. Andrew - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||