[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5

    On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, BALBIR SINGH wrote:

    > Shouldn't the interrupt mitigation be on a per CPU basis? [...]

    this was done by an earlier version of the patch, but it's wrong. An IRQ
    cannot arrive to multiple CPUs at once (well, normal device interrupts at
    least) - it will arrive either to some random CPU, or can be bound via
    /proc/irq/N/smp_affinity. (there are architectures that do
    soft-distribution of interrupts, but that can be considered pseudo-random)

    But in both cases, it's the actual, per-irq IRQ load that matters. If one
    CPU is hogged by IRQ handlers that is not an issue - other CPUs can still
    take over the work. If *all* CPUs are hogged then the patch detects the


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.020 / U:8.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site