lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Nasty suprise with uptime
Date
On Tuesdayen den 30 October 2001 17.25, Matt Bernstein wrote:
> At 18:46 +1100 Neale Banks wrote:
> >> It wraps at 496 days. The drivers are aware of it and dont crash the box
> >
> >You mean there was a time when uptime>496days would crash a system?

I think this thread is pretty stupid..., who with a little common sense ever
treasure uptime? What's important is the total downtime..., and why...

I liked one idea that popped up here where one would use a random uptime...,
that would get ignorant people to be amazed and wonder how _that_ could
be....
--
Oden Eriksson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site