lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Nasty suprise with uptime
    Date
    On Tuesdayen den 30 October 2001 17.25, Matt Bernstein wrote:
    > At 18:46 +1100 Neale Banks wrote:
    > >> It wraps at 496 days. The drivers are aware of it and dont crash the box
    > >
    > >You mean there was a time when uptime>496days would crash a system?

    I think this thread is pretty stupid..., who with a little common sense ever
    treasure uptime? What's important is the total downtime..., and why...

    I liked one idea that popped up here where one would use a random uptime...,
    that would get ignorant people to be amazed and wonder how _that_ could
    be....

    --
    Oden Eriksson

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.025 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site