[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5

    > In a generic computing environment i want to spend cycles doing useful
    > work, not polling.

    Ingo, "polling" is wrong name. It does not poll. :-)
    Actually, this misnomer is the worst thing whic I worried about.

    Citing my old explanation:

    >"Polling" is not a real polling in fact, it just accepts irqs as
    >events waking rx softirq with blocking subsequent irqs.
    >Actual receive happens at softirq.
    >Seems, this approach solves the worst half of livelock problem completely:
    >irqs are throttled and tuned to load automatically.
    >Well, and drivers become cleaner.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.043 / U:5.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site