lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5

    On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > Now test it again with the disk interrupt being shared with the
    > network card.
    >
    > Doesn't happen? It sure does. [...]

    yes, disk IRQs might be delayed in that case. Without this mechanizm there
    is a lockup.

    > Which is why I like the NAPI approach. If somebody overloads my
    > network card, my USB camera doesn't stop working.

    i agree that NAPI is a better approach. And IRQ overload does not happen
    on cards that have hardware-based irq mitigation support already. (and i
    should note that those cards will likely perform even faster with NAPI.)

    > I don't disagree with your patch as a last resort when all else fails,
    > but I _do_ disagree with it as a network load limiter.

    okay - i removed those parts already (kpolld) in today's patch. (It
    initially was an experiment to prove that this is the only problem we are
    facing under such loads.)

    Ingo

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.037 / U:31.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site