lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectModule Licensing?
Date
After reading the posts about the MODULE_LICENSE macro, I am in disbelief. I 
was under the impression that one could write a "closed-source" module and
distribute it in binary form, and be in compliance. Please tell me I am
wrong? We use Linux as a platform for some data acquisition, and we are
currently distributing ( in very limited quantity to people who would already
have signed an NDA ) modules that currently have no official license as yet.
We are researching which license to use, but according to these post's we
have almost no choice, Open Source or not at all!

-kw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.167 / U:3.748 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site