lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Non-standard MODULE_LICENSEs in 2.4.13-ac2
    Date
    From
    > but I think you are confusing intent with implementation.  The intent
    > (AFAICS) is to mark the kernel tainted ONLY if a closed-source module
    > is loaded, rather than to be a "license police" mechanism, especially
    > for sources that have been included in the kernel for a long time.

    "BSD" can indicate totally closed source material as well as other stuff

    Also Keith is right - if it is GPL compatible BSD code linked with the
    kernel then its correct to describe it as Dual BSD/GPL anyway
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:11    [W:0.021 / U:18.896 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site