Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST) | From | Luigi Genoni <> | Subject | Re: concurrent VM subsystems |
| |
Obviously I was not meaning that desktops have not to be stable, but they are not subjects to long uptimes, at less usually, so page aging is, how can I say in correct english?, dealing with different conditions...
Luigi
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, CaT wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote: > > I already exposed my opinion, and both Andrea and Rik know it very well. > > The VM for servers needs to be predictable, for desktops needs to be as > > fast as possible, also if it is a little less predictable and stable (who > > cares if you reboot you desktop once every two days?). > > It doesn't matter if it's every 2 days or 2 years if it does it just > when you're doing something that must NOT be interrupted and you lose > a buttload of work. Stability is important in both a server AND desktop > environment. > > -- > CaT "As you can expect it's really affecting my sex life. I can't help > it. Each time my wife initiates sex, these ejaculating hippos keep > floating through my mind." > - Mohd. Binatang bin Goncang, Singapore Zoological Gardens >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |