Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Oct 2001 19:09:02 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] New Driver Model for 2.5 |
| |
Hi!
> The problem of suspend-to-disk, which requires, I beleive, that the > device used for the memory backup, to be state-saved last, is still > a problem I don't know how to solve. Maybe using flags in the device
Don't care about it. Its easy.
> That would give us the following scenario: > > - The device for suspend-to-disk is identified and a flag is set > in it's device structure. This flag (or a different one to make > things clear eventually) is "broadcast" all the way up the tree > so it's parent brigdes/controllers are marked as well.
You don't need this.
> - All devices get "suspend_prepare". > - All devices get "suspend_save_state" and block normal IOs > - All devices not marked above get "suspend"
... not needed. You are going powerdown (suspend-to-disk ends in powerdown, right?), so you don't care about state devices are in. You don't need to suspend them.
You just write state to disk and powerdown, now. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |