lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: 2.4.10 build failure - atomic_dec_and_lock export
    From
    >>>>> " " == Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:

    > Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> writes:
    > |> If you have CONFIG_SMP defined then atomic_dec_and_lock will
    > |> never get defined

    > Unless you use CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, which causes
    > atomic_dec_and_lock to be versioned and defined as a macro via
    > <linux/modversions.h>.

    Oh great... That's going to confound the test in <linux/spinlock.h>
    too.

    Urgh. Can anybody propose a less ugly solution than EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS()?

    Cheers,
    Trond
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.025 / U:91.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site