lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: 2.4.10 build failure - atomic_dec_and_lock export
From
>>>>> " " == Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:

> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> writes:
> |> If you have CONFIG_SMP defined then atomic_dec_and_lock will
> |> never get defined
> Unless you use CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, which causes
> atomic_dec_and_lock to be versioned and defined as a macro via
> <linux/modversions.h>.
Oh great... That's going to confound the test in <linux/spinlock.h>
too.

Urgh. Can anybody propose a less ugly solution than EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS()?

Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans