Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:32:44 -0500 | | From | "M. R. Brown" <> | | Subject | Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols??? | |
* pierre@lineo.com <pierre@lineo.com> on Wed, Oct 17, 2001:
>
> I can make a kernel driver that compiles statically
> and also uses a non-GPL library, even in the form of
> a binary .o file, and the "tainted" mechanism as it
> is today will miss it entirely.
>
Statically into the kernel? I don't think so. First off, if your "static"
code isn't GPL'd you can't distribute the resultant kernel since you've
violated the GPL. The tainted mechanism was designed for proprietary
and/or binary-only modules without a supported license. The case you
mention above can't even exist (at least, not in any publically-accessible
code).
M. R.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |