[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac11 parport_pc.c bugfix
    Thomas Hood [] wrote:
    > I guess the question is: Which way is more portable? Is
    > "(unsigned long)-1" liable to turn out as something other than
    > ~0U?
    > If your way of expressing it is more portable then we should
    > make the change ... BOTH in pnp_bios.c and in parport_pc.c .
    > Opinions?

    unsigned long is 64-bits on 64-bit archs, and so (unsigned long)-1 will be
    different than on intel...

    I think that's ~0UL?

    Maybe this is why I can't get pnp stuff to work on my alpha?

    -- Bob

    Bob McElrath (
    Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.042 / U:4.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site