[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion
    On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Paul McKenney wrote:
    > > I don't think it's actually all that bad. There won't be all
    > > that many places that require the rmbdd, and they'll pretty
    > > much exactly correspond to the places in which you have to put
    > > wmb for all architectures anyway.
    > Just to make sure I understand... This rmbdd() would use IPIs to
    > get all the CPUs' caches synchronized, right?

    Err, I see your confusion now.

    "Correspond" meaning "for every wmb needed on the writer side,
    there is likely an rmb needed on the reader side in a similar

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:08    [W:0.069 / U:6.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site