Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:35:40 +0200 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: VM: 2.4.10 vs. 2.4.10-ac2 and qsort() |
| |
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I'm not sure either, since qsort doesn't really have much > locality of reference but just walks all over the place. > > This is direct contrast with the basic assumption on which > VM and CPU caches are built ;) > > I wonder how eg. merge sort would perform ...
Just rip it off NetBSD and there you go. (FreeBSD's breaks on machines like SPARC, NetBSD's does not.)
http://www.de.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/basesrc/lib/libc/stdlib/merge.c?rev=1.10&cvsroot=netbsd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |