Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 07:25:27 +0100 (CET) | From | Sasi Peter <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me... |
| |
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:46:29PM +0100, Sasi Peter wrote: > > What I had w/2.2.18pre19 (+raid+ide): > > ~80MB more in cache and ~80MB swapped out (eg. currently unused notes > > server and squid) There is enough of swap over 3 disks (like the > > raid), so I did not bother disabling squid and notes, since - I thought - > > they would only take up some swap unused. > > There are many variables. However I guess the slowdown is because your idle > apps didn't got swapped out in favour of cache as you noticed. An aggressive > aging algorithm would probably fix that but it then would hurt other cases > (after you don't need a frequenty accessed part of filesystem cache anymore it > would take ages before it gets collected potentially causing an unnecessary > swapout storms because the kernel doesn't know you don't need such cache > anymore). Furthmore if notes and squid are rarely running but they provides > critical services if they would go totally into swap in favour of fs cache you > would get very bad latencies the first time somebody connects to the server. So > the fix I suggest you is to buy more ram or to shutdown squid and notes. Than
Oh well I thought 384MB should be enought for everyone aiming at this performance (almost TM ;). At least it would up till now :(
> you may as well see a performance improvement compared to 2.2.18pre19 > (+raid+ide). Otherwise you can push the machine low on memory a bit until they > both goes totally into swap (check with `ps v`). Hope this helps.
I'll try this, thanks. (so no echo '1 23 456' >/proc/sys/vm/...?)
-- SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape@sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |