[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement
    On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > This is totally offtopic. We were _not_ talking about other
    > algorithms. We were _only_ talking about _when_ the 1 bit of
    > aging I introduced with my algorithm improves performance at
    > max. My answer is that the max performance improvement happens
    > when there's the _highest_ VFS load in background and you
    > disagreed. Everything else has nothing to do with this our
    > previous discussion so your above reply partly still doesn't
    > make sense to me.

    Not only did I disagree, I also explained you why it
    doesn't work the way you envision.

    Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets
    close this thread.


    Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
    Trailer at 11.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.042 / U:72.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site