Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:26:43 -0800 (PST) | From | David Lang <> |
| |
probably not now that SMP athlon boards are supposed to be starting to be available.
David Lang
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:37:02 -0800 > From: David Ford <david@linux.com> > To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> > Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefined) > > Mhm. Is it worth the effort to make a dependancy on the CPU type for SMP? > > </idle questions> > > -d > > Stephen Frost wrote: > > > * David Ford (david@linux.com) wrote: > > > A person just brought up a problem in #kernelnewbies, building an SMP > > > kernel doesn't work very well, current is undefined. I don't have more > > > time to debug it but I'll strip the config and put it up at > > > http://stuph.org/smp-config > > > > They're trying to compile SMP for Athlon/K7 (CONFIG_MK7=y). > > -- > There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson > The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |