[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement
    On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:47:39PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > Not really. Under very high VFS loads we'd just scan
    > > through the list twice and free the entries anyway.
    > You're obviously wrong.
    > The higher was the load, the faster your working set was getting
    > dropped from the dcache. (with the patch the working set will
    > have a chance to remains in cache also with polluting going on
    > instead,

    > The example with only pollution in the cache doesn't make sense,

    Ever heard of slocate / updatedb ?


    Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
    Trailer at 11.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.042 / U:0.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site