Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:09:01 -0200 (BRDT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement |
| |
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:47:39PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Not really. Under very high VFS loads we'd just scan > > through the list twice and free the entries anyway. > > You're obviously wrong. > > The higher was the load, the faster your working set was getting > dropped from the dcache. (with the patch the working set will > have a chance to remains in cache also with polluting going on > instead,
> The example with only pollution in the cache doesn't make sense,
Ever heard of slocate / updatedb ?
regards,
Rik -- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |