[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd)

    James Sutherland writes:
    > Except you can detect and deal with these "PMTU black holes". Just as you
    > should detect and deal with ECN black holes. Maybe an ideal Internet
    > wouldn't have them, but this one does. If you can find an ideal Internet,
    > go code for it: until then, stick with the real one. It's all we've got.

    Guess what, Linux works not around PMTU black holes either for the
    same exact reason we will not work around ECN.

    I'm getting a bit tired of you, and I suppose others are as
    well. You are being nothing but a pompous ass.

    Anyways, let me quote a comment from the Linux source code where
    we would have done PMTU black hole detection:

    /* NOTE. draft-ietf-tcpimpl-pmtud-01.txt requires pmtu black
    hole detection. :-(

    It is place to make it. It is not made. I do not want
    to make it. It is disguisting. It does not work in any
    case. Let me to cite the same draft, which requires for
    us to implement this:

    "The one security concern raised by this memo is that ICMP black holes
    are often caused by over-zealous security administrators who block
    all ICMP messages. It is vitally important that those who design and
    deploy security systems understand the impact of strict filtering on
    upper-layer protocols. The safest web site in the world is worthless
    if most TCP implementations cannot transfer data from it. It would
    be far nicer to have all of the black holes fixed rather than fixing
    all of the TCP implementations."

    Golden words :-).

    David S. Miller
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.022 / U:1.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site