Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: Renaming lost+found | Date | 28 Jan 2001 13:35:44 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <3A73565B.6EBC7F77@ngforever.de> By author: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex. > You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file > system without a lost+found is a lot worse. >
Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck &c) use "/lost+found" by name, or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode number (11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |