Messages in this thread | | | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? | Date | Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:47:58 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
Rogier Wolff writes: > Harware problems are normally not reproducable. Can you attach a > debugger to your X server, and catch it when things go bad? (And > give the Xfree86 people a backtrace)
Bad RAM can be extremely reproducable though, and can certainly produce SEGVs.
Evidence: I recently had a bad 128MB SDRAM which *always* failed at byte address 0x220068, which was the middle of the mem_map array. All I needed to do was 'dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null' and the machine would die within 5 minutes due to an invalid buffer_head pointer.
The SDRAM naturally passed each and every single memory test I could throw at it. However, a new SDRAM fixed the problem.
It is quite common for SDRAMs to fail in this way - think about the failure mode. Some of the silicon in the SDRAM is damaged. This isn't going to move about, so its going to be in a fixed position. A fixed position means a specific set of transistors, gate, and therefore memory location.
In answer to the original posters question, the first step would be to grab a copy of memtest86 (iirc its a program that is run from floppy disk) and run that on your system. That /should/ (and I stress should there) detect any RAM problems you have.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |