[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: named streams, extended attributes, and posix
    Mo McKinlay wrote:

    > openstream(file, stream, flags)
    > Where 'file' should be an fd (although i'm sure the VFS gods will think of
    > plenty of reasons why this is a bad idea, at which point I'll
    > conventiently change my mind ;). Stream is simply the name of the stream,
    > flags are as with open() (O_RDONLY, et al). openstream() then returns an
    > fd which can be read/written/sendfiled/closed as the programmer wishes.

    I'm not opposed to that, and think it is even a useful idea. Sort of
    like fdopen().

    > Apart from the additional of a new open()-type call, your paper seems to
    > be fairly solid.

    Thanks. I think having the option of the namespace augmentation would be
    useful, in terms of supporting existing filesystems. On NTFS, ":" is not
    a legal filename character anyway. The namespace augmentation suggested
    in the paper would allow filesystems like NTFS to work as they should,
    and all other filesystems to ignore it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.021 / U:0.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site