Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:02:52 -0500 | From | "Scott A. Sibert" <> | Subject | Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 |
| |
Hi Urban.
I'm connecting to a Win2K server (same share between computers). A slight change in my previous post: my dual P2 w/320MB appears to be running 2.4.0-ac9 instead of 2.4.1-pre8. The bigmem machine (1gb mem) had the oops on 2.4.0-ac9 but before reporting I thought I'd try 2.4.1-pre8 and see if it also had the oops. (This morning the small mem machine had a problem but I'll put that in a separate email.)
Earlier I had tried 2.4.0-test12 but it partially scrambled my root partition so I went back to 2.2.19-pre2. After the oops I tried 2.4.0 straight but when it was booting it decided my root partition had been umounted not-cleanly and decided it needed to do lots of icky things to my root partition. I just rebooted it (without letting it do any changes) and went back into 2.4.1-pre8 and let it clean up the root partition. So I don't know if 2.4.0 straight would do this (apparently it does from other people's reports) since 2.4.0 didn't want to play nice on my machine.
Since I can't do without smbfs I guess I'll have to do without bigmem. Please let me know when you're ready to test some fixes; I would be glad to help testing.
--Scott
Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Scott A. Sibert wrote: > >> I'm consistently getting an oops when accessing any smbfs mount whether >> running 'ls' inside the smbfs mount or hitting TAB for filename >> completion of a directory in an smbfs mount. I have another machine >> (dual P2/300 w/320MB memory) that does not have this problem. The P2 > > > That other machine is not compiled with bigmem, I assume. > > >> Ethernet is compiled into the kernel as is smbfs (not as modules). I've >> compiled this kernel with 4GB bigmem support (otherwise I only get 8xxMB >> total). > > > The smbfs cache code in 2.4.0 doesn't work with bigmem. For now disable > bigmem or don't use smbfs, it's oopsing all the time. > > Rainer Mager reported the same thing yesterday ("Oops with 4GB memory > setting in 2.4.0 stable" if you want to read the thread). > > I am currently looking into this ... what kind of server are you > connecting to? win2k/NT4/9x? It is easier to test with those than the more > exotic OS/2 & NetApp. > > /Urban >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |