lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]]

On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> > {
> > int val = 1;
> > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > (char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > val = 0;
> > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > (char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > }
> >
> > differ from what you posted. It does the same in my opinion. Maybe we are
> > not talking about the same thing?
>
> The above is equivalent to SIOCPUSH _only_ if the caller wasn't using either
> TCP_NODELAY or TCP_CORK.

why? I can restore whatever state i want, the above is just a mechanizm to
force the push.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.132 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site