[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta1 available at
    Anton, you write:
    > Have a look at 2.4, arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c


    > Would it be possible to clean up the ioctl interface so we dont need
    > such large hacks for LVM support? I can do the work but I want to be
    > sure you guys will agree to it.

    What is the reason for all this? Alignment/wordsize/other? If you look
    at the IOP10 code, much of the in-core data structs were changed to int
    or long, so this sparc code may not be necessary. It may in fact be
    damaging, because I don't know if any of the LVM developers even know it
    is there, and surely it will be out of sync...

    Cheers, Andreas
    Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
    \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" -- Dogbert
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.020 / U:13.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site