Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rich Baum" <> | Date | Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:17:11 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0 |
| |
On 9 Jan 2001, at 23:10, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:31:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > don't have to worry about undocumented extensions etc. > > > > Infact I don't blame gcc maintainers for that, but the standard. Ok, minor > > issue. > > Yeah, and nothing we can do about it any more.. Oh, well. > > The fact is that the > > case xxx: ; > > syntax is fairly ugly, so I'd prefer the fixup patches to look more like > > case xxx: > /* fallthrough */ ; > } > > or something (or maybe just a "break" statement), just so that we don't > turn the poor C language into line noise (can anybody say "perl" ;) > > I have to say, I think it was Pascal had this "no semicolon needed before > an 'end'" rule, and I always really hated that. The C statement rules make > a lo tmore sense, and requiring a statement after a case statement is > probably a very good requirement from a language standpoint. It's just not > very pretty - but adding a break or a comment will at least separate out > the colon and the semi-colon a bit. > > Linus > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I'll redo my patch to use break; and then I'll resend it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |