[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: What is up with Redhat 7.0?
    On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > > They released a supported ex-Cygnus people approved compiler.
    > >
    > > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial
    > > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
    > And didnt you write something called pgcc once.

    pgcc never was incompatible at binary level to gcc/egcs.

    > *PLONK*

    It's really absurd to attack Lehmann but I understand that's
    your job.

    RedHat workers should accept that they working for a company
    that works against the community. This does not mean that
    each individual worker works against the community but this
    fact is not really important.
    That's simply a fact that you can't discuss away by attacking Lehmann
    who is one of the main integration persons (gcc/egcs).

    Please read


    ciao -

    " A standard that defines "bc" but not "dc" is broken by design - SUS "

    Stefan Traby Linux/ia32 fax: +43-3133-6107-9
    Mitterlasznitzstr. 13 Linux/alpha phone: +43-3133-6107-2
    8302 Nestelbach Linux/sparc
    Austria mailto://
    Europe mailto://
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.027 / U:13.700 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site