[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Bottom Handles/soft irqs/timer interrupts/SMP .....
    On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 11:41:57PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
    > On sparc blocking interrupts does not block the reception of cpu cross
    > calls, so you cannot do anything like grab locks within a called function.

    So if you can't handle the IPI when you get it, set a flag and trap on the
    next sti. It certainly sounds like broken hardware to me and it can be
    worked around, can't it ?

    Maybe we should have a version of smp_call_function that uses softirqs
    (unless those are broken on sparc as well ;) ) and use the old version for
    the very performance-sensitive parts only ?

    Putting all tests for smp_call_function in the timer interrupt code doesn't
    make any sense at all to me.

    Philipp Rumpf
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.028 / U:1.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site