[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?)

    On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:

    > ie should we say that ALL distros have to ship with, and be compatible with the
    > standard kernel? If a distro has a patch that they want in the kernel, and the
    > mainstream kernel doesn't feel it belongs, should it be labeled differently?
    > Do we go with a Debian Linux, Redhat Linux, etc.. accepting that they are all
    > different, but from a common heritage
    Why not? Worked for BSD just fine.

    > or should there be a 'seal of approval' so that
    > a distro can indicate it is 100% linux mainstream, as in
    > SomeDistro Linux, '100% Linux Standard Compliant'

    Yeah... And then we'll have every marketdroid and his mom
    _really_ trying hard to get every patch into the main tree. Thanks, but no

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:2.808 / U:0.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site