Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Sep 2000 19:37:11 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ |
| |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> OO is indeed != C++. But since it's a relative if C, it's the most > suitable option to use in the kernel.
What's wrong with C itself?
> > - A _lot_ of the kernel code/design is inherently object-oriented. So > > pardon our collective scepticism when YAC++Advocate comes along waving > > the "OO ergo C++" underw^Wflag > > OO design had nothing to do with OO implementation. I can design a system > totally in OO, and implement it in C. Really stupid thing to do I think, > but it's possible..
Try it someday. That's how VFS/VM/filesystems are done.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |